firstly, i'd like to say that no, i wasn't experimenting with the live client. or at least wasn't intending to.
but i realized just now that my computer's system clock was some 20 minutes ahead. of course i went to set it immediately. when i pressed ok, thud suddenly said **No Cow: Time seems to be running backwards. Beware of paradoxes: please avoid killing your father.**. I had come across this error before, in other situations, so i wasn't sure if this had anything to do with me setting my system clock back. so i tried again. and again i got a No Cow error. this made me curious and besides, i now had my clock 3 minutes behind the actual time. setting it from 26 to 29 mins past gave me - not very surprisingly - ye good ole **Out Of Cheese ERROR: Disconnected from server. Reason: Ping timeout.**
now i'd like to know: is this intended or just some byproduct?
My computer = time machine?













Re: My computer = time machine?
**No Cow: Time seems to be running backwards. Beware of paradoxes: please avoid killing your father.**
It's this attention to detail that I love...
"LOOKS PERFECTLY LOGICAL TO ME"
Re: My computer = time machine?
I'm so happy someone ran into that one
In the absence of a time machine, none of that was ever tested.
And yes, when I was writing the ping timeouts, I realised that I was assuming that time was doing normal sensible stuff, progressing by about a second for every second that the computer counted. And in a world of timezone-crossing jet-setters and daylight saving time and network lag and people with interestingly configured system clocks, there was no reason that an effect could not precede the cause, or a program could not receive a "ping" dated at some point in the future, or from before the previous "ping" received, or something.
Since, to a computer, time is generally measured in seconds since 1970, this will appear to happen at least once every 66 years, as the computer runs out of fingers to count the seconds on, and has to start over. Some systems count milliseconds since the computer was turned on: they run out of fingers lots faster, and to them, time goes back to the beginning every few days instead. One version of windows (win 95?) didn't take this into account, and fell over every few days, until they patched it.
And I remembered a unix quote file entry I read many years ago:
We have the most thorough test guy in the world. I showed him this program and he asked, "but Rob, what if time runs backwards?"
To a nonprogrammer, just a throwaway line about the silliness of geeks. To a programmer, a cautionary tale not to take anything for granted. So I programmed in that test, so that it wouldn't fall over if time ran backwards
If you set your clock back a minute or two, I think you should also get a confirmation once time sorts itself out again. Again, not thoroughly tested.
Yet another geek.
Re: My computer = time machine?
If you set your clock back a minute or two, I think you should also get a confirmation once time sorts itself out again. Again, not thoroughly tested.
if you need someone to test it... my system clock is about two minutes per half an hour faster than a normal clock, so at least till i finally have my new motherboard (which will hopefully not have that problem) i will have plenty of motivation to test that
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. – Mark Twain
Save the rats, eat a dwarf!
Re: My computer = time machine?
Go for it
Yet another geek.
Re: My computer = time machine?
so i didn't get any confirmations at all. just the no cow. when i set it back by one minute immediately after setting it back by three i didn't get an error for the one minute though. and the out of cheese errors came with the usual reconnecting stuff.
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. – Mark Twain
Save the rats, eat a dwarf!
Re: My computer = time machine?
i find that when my computer becomes i time machine i should stop drinking for a while,but that's just me,you guys seem to be involved in something a bit more technical tho
_O_
ll( )ll
_] [_