I'm not familiar with that many newgroups but I was wondering, what's the deal with people who,ve been here for ages and have 4 pts at best?
I'm not saying that not having mountains of points makes you a bad thudster but look at the facts, there are at last is checked 3 users "younger" than me on the top 30 list so time spent here should be an indication of you points and yet there are users in the 200 range who haven't half a dozen points to their name.
why? do people sign up and just stop caring or what. they should probably be discounted from official user numbers as they aren't an accurate representation of the level of activity on the site
P.S. please note the handy [Sgt L] label similar to my proposed language labels for foreign language threads. this label means that the thread in question was started by me and has a high potential existence in the plain of irrelevance.
cheers
Re: [Sgt L] disusers
P.S. please note the handy [Sgt L] label similar to my proposed language labels for foreign language threads. this label means that the thread in question was started by me and has a high potential existence in the plain of irrelevance.
I dunno about the other stuff, but that's definately a wise idea that I'll be taking full advantage of
"LOOKS PERFECTLY LOGICAL TO ME"
Re: [Sgt L] disusers
see, because I'm nice
That ain't no English I ever dun heard!
Re: [Sgt L] disusers
that's actually a good idea,cos now other users can sort of guess what to expect when it comes to the forum in question if you see straight away who created it.
_O_
ll( )ll
_] [_